|
|
||
![]() |
| Alaska
Wilderness
|
|
|
|
Wilderness Bill:
MN – Congresswoman McCollum
(MN-04), Congressman Ellison (MN-05), Congressman Nolan (MN-08) IA – Congressman Braley
(IA-01), Congressman Loebsack (IA-02)
Arctic
Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Recently
13 CEOs of conservation groups, including: Alaska Wilderness League,
National Audubon Society, Defenders of Wildlife, Environment America,
Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, League of Conservation Voters, Native
American Rights Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ocean
Conservancy, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Sierra Club and The
Wilderness Society sent a letter to Interior Secretary Sally Jewell
moments after she was sworn into office to encourage her to finalize the
overdue Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) for the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge as one of her first acts in office. After
more than three years of work by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in
Alaska and Washington, DC, a CCP for the Arctic Refuge is nearly
complete, and signers to the letter urged Jewell to get it over the
finish line. Alaska Wilderness League
along with the groups listed below have been mobilizing and organizing
activists online and offline to add their names to the push to protect
the Arctic Ocean from Shell and other Big Oil companies – and the
momentum is working, as Shell has already cancelled plans to drill this
year after 12 months of errors, mishaps, and near-disasters, and Conoco
Phillips has cancelled plans to begin to pursue Arctic drilling. An oil spill in the Arctic
Ocean could devastate human and wildlife communities alike. President
Obama cannot allow drilling in the Arctic Ocean. Shell’s long list of
setbacks and failures – coupled with the extreme risk for oil spills
and further climate destruction in an already fragile ecosystem –
provides overwhelming evidence that the oil and gas industry is not
prepared to operate safely in the Arctic Ocean. President Obama should
prioritize protecting the Arctic as part of his climate legacy and not
approve any further offshore drilling in the region. “For hundreds of thousands
of Americans, seeing Shell’s drilling rig run aground in the harsh
Arctic weather last December was the last straw. The outpouring of
action since then is a loud and clear signal that President Obama should
suspend all risky and dangerous drilling activities in the Arctic Ocean. Sierra Club – Alaska
Wilderness League – Center for Biological Diversity – Friends of the
Earth – Greenpeace – Earthjustice – National Audubon Society –
Natural Resources Defense Council – The Wilderness Society – League
of Conservation Voters – CREDO In a speech on the House Floor, Alaskan Congressman Don Young urged his colleagues in the Senate to put a hold on the nomination of Sally Jewell to succeed Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, until the Department of Interior signs off on a land exchange that would allow the residents of King Cove limited emergency road access through the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge. To read Rep. Young's entire statement on the King Cove road issue, click here. Shell Fails in 2012 Shell began 2012 by stating that they were ready to drill for oil in America’s Arctic Ocean. On New Year’s Eve, Shell’s promises rang false yet again — with an exclamation point to end its series of failures in 2012 – the “Kulluk” drill rig ran aground near Kodiak Island in a ferocious Gulf of Alaska storm.
Sign Alaska Wilderness's petition to President Obama asking him to not allow Shell to drill in America's Arctic Ocean.
UPDATE: September 17, 2012 Shell Abandons Plans to Drill in the Arctic this Year: Oil Giant Still Ill-Equipped to Handle Extreme Arctic Conditions Washington, DC -- Royal Dutch Shell has announced that it will not move forward with plans to drill for oil in the Arctic's Beaufort and Chukchi Seas this year. Known as the Polar Bear Seas, these waters are home to the entire US population of polar bears and serve as an important migration route for bowhead and beluga whales. They are also home to some of the most extreme and dangerous conditions on the planet, making drilling a risky proposition. In response Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune issued the following statement: "Shell's announcement is recognition of what we've been saying all along-the company cannot safely drill in our Arctic waters. Shell's disturbing trend of failing to meet safety and pollution requirements comes against a backdrop of shifting ice floes and other reminders of the dangers and difficulty of drilling in the Arctic. The extreme conditions of the Arctic have resulted in a delicate natural balance that has allowed wildlife and local communities to survive for generations. Oil drilling here could damage Arctic waters and wildlife for decades and end Alaska Natives' ancient subsistence way of life. Realizing the dangers of drilling in this pristine and harsh environment, more than a million people have spoken out in opposition to Shell's drilling plans over the past months. The truth is that we don't need to open this irreplaceable area to drilling. Instead we should focus on making our cars cleaner and more efficient, expanding our transportation choices and investing in clean energy innovation. The Polar Bear Seas, special places in the Western Arctic and the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should be protected, not given away to Big Oil. "
Shell Receives Approval to Start Arctic Drilling Prep Work Royal Dutch Shell today received permission to begin preparations to drill in the Arctic’s Chukchi Sea despite the fact that its oil spill response vessel is not yet certified or in place. In response Dan Ritzman, Sierra Club Arctic Program Director, issued the following statement. “The reality is that we don’t know what Shell will encounter when they begin drilling to lay the groundwork for wells in the Polar Bear Seas. Allowing the company to move ahead without a vital piece of its oil spill response plan unnecessarily increases the risk to Arctic waters, wildlife and communities. Shell’s inability to meet the safety and pollution requirements it agreed to presents a disturbing trend. The company must be held accountable at every step in the process. It should not be allowed to get a jumpstart on drilling or extend its drilling season simply because of poor preparation.”
Chill
the Drills
The Bullying Congressman vs. Arctic National Wildlife Refuge A hearing about
drilling in the Arctic Refuge got pretty heated when Rep. Don Young
(R-AK) called testimony about protecting the Arctic Refuge “garbage”
and said that those who care about conserving this critical wild place
were “elitists.” Professor Douglas Brinkley, an acclaimed historian
and Arctic Refuge expert, stood up to a Congressional bully – you can
watch their exchange here. Watch the video and share it with your friends.
Arctic Ocean The
Arctic Ocean is one of the most productive, fragile, and least
understood marine ecosystems in the world. Unfortunately, it is
also one of the world’s most threatened marine environments. Made up
of the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, America’s Arctic Ocean is facing
accelerating and dramatic changes due to climate change, along with
proposals for massive and risky oil and gas development.
Arctic Refuge UPDATE:
U.S.
Congress, CONSERVATION Groups call for the strongest possible
protections for the arctic national wildlife refuge - 57
Members of U.S. Congress Send Letter to President Obama Calling for the
Strongest Protections of the Iconic Arctic Refuge on its 50th Anniversary
- In early October, Representative Edward Markey (D-MA)
led a
letter,
signed by 56 other Members of the House of Representatives to President
Obama, calling for the strongest possible protections for the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge during this historic year – the 50th
anniversary of its original creation. Despite numerous battles to open
the Refuge for drilling throughout the years, strong bi-partisan support
has kept the Refuge protected. The House Members stated in the letter
that, “now is the time to grant the Refuge the strong, long-term
protections it deserves so that we can pass this unspoiled American
treasure to our children and grandchildren.” A recent poll shows that a
vast majority of Americans support commemorating the 50th
anniversary of the Refuge by granting it stronger protections. The poll
showed that more than 60 percent of Americans would like to see the
Arctic Refuge recognized at a level on par with other pristine landmarks
such as the Grand Canyon, Muir Woods, and Yellowstone. UPDATE: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced on September 27, 2010, that it would exercise its authority under federal law to conduct a wilderness review for nearly all non-Wilderness areas of the Arctic Refuge, including the Coastal Plain, as part of the Comprehensive Conservation Planning (CCP) process. This will determine if these areas should be designated as Wilderness. While the Arctic Refuge is the only National Wildlife Refuge in the United States that was created specifically for its wilderness values, a full wilderness study of the Coastal Plain has never been conducted. The review was scheduled to be released in May 2012. It has not yet been released. Western
Arctic/The Reserve The
National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska is one of Alaska’s best kept secrets
and one of our nation’s greatest natural treasures. The administration
and Congress must work to keep important habitat areas within the Reserve
protected from destructive industrial development. UPDATE:
According to the USGS, “The
estimated volume of undiscovered oil is significantly lower than estimates
released in 2002, owing primarily to recent exploration drilling that
revealed an abrupt transition from oil to gas and reduced reservoir
quality in the Alpine sandstone 15–20 miles west of the giant Alpine oil
field. The National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPRA) has been the focus
of oil exploration during the past decade, stimulated by the mid-1990s
discovery of the adjacent Alpine field—the largest onshore oil discovery
in the United States during the past 25 years. Recent activities in NPRA,
including extensive 3–D seismic surveys, six Federal lease sales
totaling more than $250 million in bonus bids, and completion of more than
30 exploration wells on Federal and Native lands, indicate in key
formations more gas than oil and poorer reservoir quality than
anticipated. In the absence of a gas pipeline from northern Alaska,
exploration has waned and several petroleum companies have relinquished
assets in the NPRA.” For more see
here On July 21, 2010, a federal court judge in Alaska cancelled a Bush-era lease sale that opened critically important waters within the Arctic's Chukchi Sea to dangerous oil and gas drilling. The court agreed with Alaska Natives and Alaska Wilderness League that the federal government had failed to consider the environmental impacts of drilling on the fragile Arctic ecosystem before allowing oil companies to purchase leases. As Caroline Cannon, president of the Native Village of Point Hope, an Inupiat Eskimo whaling community that survives off the bounty of the Chukchi Sea, told the Associated Press: "So little is known about our Arctic Ocean. Scientifically, they have not enough data. [It's] so good ... that the world has heard us, in a sense." This ruling is the latest in a string of decisions showing that our nation's proposed Arctic drilling program is fundamentally flawed. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar must now take the time to gather crucial information about this unique, fragile marine environment and ensure that the Arctic remains a pristine, abundant place. As always, the League will keep you updated on opportunities to advocate for our one and only Arctic ecosystem. Find out more.
UPDATE: The Bureau of Ocean Energy, Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) in August 2011 released a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Chukchi Sea Oil and Gas Lease Sale 193, held in February 2008. The Final SEIS provides additional environmental analysis that supplements the review originally completed as part of the planning for Lease Sale 193. Specifically, the Final SEIS addresses concerns raised by the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska in its July 21, 2010, decision remanding Lease Sale 193 back to the agency, incorporates additional public comment, and includes a new analysis of the environmental impacts of a hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill (VLOS) scenario. Find out more.
Bristol Bay Home of Salmon, Gold and Copper Alaska's Bristol Bay is a place of bounty and balance. It is blessed with more than half of all wild salmon in the world! A report by the University of Washington reveals the intricacy of the ecosystem, embodied in its sustainable fishery: salmon populations have adapted to each individual stream that feeds Bristol Bay, their cycles of ebb and flow continually self-regulating the species. A truly natural blessing! But, Bristol Bay also has an abundance of another kind: minerals. The proposed Pebble Mine development, if built, would be one of the world's largest gold and copper mines. Positioned near vital watersheds and salmon streams, Pebble Mine and other hard-rock mining threaten the natural balance here. Damaging even a few streams with toxic mining runoff would disrupt the natural diversity of the ecosystem, permanently upsetting this natural system. Multiple species of wild salmon thrive in Bristol Bay and this natural abundance has fostered a truly remarkable natural resource. As salmon journey upstream to spawn in the nutrient rich waters, they replenish the streams with minerals from the ocean and fertilize the trees as feeding wildlife sow them about the forest. It is a truly balanced cycle. These iconic salmon also yield vital human benefits, supporting local communities, subsistence cultures, world-class angling, recreational boating and fishing, and a healthy food source for the entire country! Earlier in the year, the U.S. Department of the Interior rightfully prevented offshore drilling in the bay, calling it a "national treasure." But the toxic threat of hard-rock mining onshore still threatens to tip the balance. The Department's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) must do its part to protect Bristol Bay.
Tongass National Forest The “Sealaska bill” (S. 881/H.R. 2099) would
transfer to private ownership some of the richest and most biologically
productive lands in the Tongass National Forest. These lands are
targeted for clearcut logging, threatening the intricate ecosystem
and its small forest-dependent communities and thriving local
industries. This bill has sparked widespread controversy and may
undermine the ongoing collaborative dialogue on the future of
the Tongass. The Sealaska bill only serves to reaffirm the old, divisive
way of doing business. Any congressional action on the Tongass must
include the strongest protections possible for valuable, intact
old-growth and restore important fish and wildlife habitat damaged by
past logging. UPDATE:
U.S. Forest Service’s Implementation of a New Program of Work for the
Tongass National Forest - Alaska
Wilderness League commends the U.S. Forest Service for taking a strong,
first step to advance a new vision of forest management in the Tongass
National Forest. With the release of the 5-year project schedule, the
Forest Service has made a substantive shift away from an unsustainable
reliance on old-growth logging to a more comprehensive and balanced
program of work. The updated program of work emphasizes managing the
forest to conserve important fish and wildlife habitat, promotes job
opportunities, and enhances the sustainability of our southeast Alaska
communities. The
Tongass contains some of the best fish, wildlife, water, and forest
resources in the country. By conserving fish and wildlife habitat in
undeveloped areas and restoring habitat in areas previously impacted by
clearcut logging, the Forest Service is prudently managing resources for
key regional assets such as commercial fishing, recreation, tourism, and
traditional and customary uses. Dispatches from the Last Frontier (from Alaska Wilderness League) As the oil from the Deepwater Horizon disaster began to reach the shores of the Gulf of Mexico, Alaska Native leaders traveled to the Gulf coast on a solidarity mission. The following is their story, as reported by Rosemary Ahtuangaruak. We start our trip feeling a great burden to bear – this is not something we want to do but something we must do. Our regional tribal council requested that we tour the Gulf of Mexico and report back about the Deepwater Horizon exploratory well blowout. Our lands are in the Arctic, a harsh, cold, remote place, unforgiving to those who are unprepared. And our traditions and our culture – hunting, whaling and sharing – are dependent on the lands, waters and air. Click here to continue reading about this solidarity mission.
Alaska Senators Lisa Murkowski (R) and Mark Begich (D) are proposing
“directional drilling,” which really means they want to drill sideways
into the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from other
environmentally sensitive areas, including offshore platforms in the Polar
Bear Seas. The Coast Guard counted an average of 90 oil spills per day in
the Contact Phyllis Mains pmains@juno.com or 641-445-6326 to get involved in Arctic Wilderness issues
Last updated 04.26.13 |
Phyllis Mains, a former Iowa Chapter ExCom member, recently backpacked the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Read her story.
Schedule an Arctic Presentation Iowa Chapter member Phyllis Mains traveled to Alaska and hiked in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. You can see some of her magnificent photographs here... Phyllis is also available to do presentations about the Arctic for your group. For more information, contact Phyllis at pmains@juno.com.
Check out the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve on Google Earth
NOAA's Arctic Report Card: Update for 2009
Arctic Nations Link Polar Bear Survival to Climate Protection
America's Last Great Wilderness Learn more about the Arctic Refuge here...
|